By Dhananath Fernando
Originally appeared on the Morning
How should the President judge whether his upcoming Budget is good or bad? A budget is not only about income, expenditure, and the gap in between. A national budget sets policy direction while balancing the books.
In Sri Lanka there is limited control on the expenditure side in the short term. The largest item is interest payments. Most of the rest is recurrent spending on salaries, pensions, and transfers. Even when capital allocations are made for public infrastructure, they are often underspent to plug rising recurrent bills.
So how do we judge the numbers fairly when interest costs are so high? Take interest out and see if our revenue covers all non-interest spending. That is the primary balance. If revenue exceeds non-interest expenditure, we have a primary surplus.
Interest payments are largely inherited liabilities, and there is very little a finance minister can change quickly. This means the first test of a sound budget is whether the primary balance improves credibly.
But budgets are also about policy signals. Do they show a pro-poor, pro-growth direction that reduces people’s cost of living and helps businesses invest? On that front, this Budget will tell us whether the President is serious about lowering the cost of construction.
Before being elected, while presenting the National People’s Power (NPP) economic manifesto, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake said the price of tiles was too high and that import controls had pushed construction costs up. Now there is an opportunity to correct this.
Among many inputs, four items matter for any basic building: cement, steel, tiles, and sanitary ware. If the Government wants growth, policy should aim to bring these costs down.
A practical way is to cut para tariffs like cess and the Ports and Airports Development Levy (PAL), and to rationalise Customs duties where possible. Border taxes hurt cash flow because they are paid upfront.
When you import cement or tiles, cess and PAL are charged at the point of entry, so the project’s cost is frontloaded. That pushes financing needs up on day one, raises interest costs on working capital, and can make projects unviable. House builders delay, small contractors scale down, and factory expansions stall.
Today a bag of cement in Sri Lanka often costs nearly twice what it does in Thailand, and other materials show similar gaps. The result is visible in half-built houses and delayed renovations across the country. Lowering these input costs will help families finish a home, schools stretch their budgets further, and firms add floor space to expand production.
So here are the two simple tests to judge this Budget.
First, does the primary balance improve in a way that is believable and sustained?
Second, does the Budget lower the cost of construction by cutting para tariffs, simplifying taxes, and allowing more competition and supply?
If both tests are met, the Budget will be pro-poor and pro-growth. If not, the numbers may look tidy for a year, but homes will stay unfinished and investments will remain on hold.