Advocata Institute urges Govt. to uphold electricity sector reforms

Originally appeared in the Daily FT

The Advocata Institute yesterday called on the Government to reaffirm its commitment to the critical reforms initiated by the 2024 Electricity Act.

The think tank emphasised the necessity of legally separating the Ceylon Electricity Board’s (CEB) functions and fostering a competitive and transparent electricity industry.

“The 2024 Electricity Act was a landmark step towards a more efficient and accountable energy sector,” said Advocata Institute CEO Dhananath Fernando. “Sri Lanka cannot afford to fall back into a monopoly-driven model at a time when attracting private capital and enhancing efficiency are critical to economic recovery and energy security.”

In its newly released paper, “Powering Forward: Why Unbundling the CEB is Critical for Sri Lanka’s Energy Future,” Advocata warns that proposed amendments to the 2024 Electricity Act threaten to reverse decades of progress in the sector. The Institute states that such reversals could severely undermine Sri Lanka’s economic and fiscal stability.

The paper critiques some of the 2025 amendments to the Sri Lanka Electricity Act, which seek to reconsolidate the CEB by placing generation, transmission, and distribution under 100% State control. Advocata argues that this reversal would entrench inefficiencies, deter private investment, and further strain already constrained public finances.

The position paper outlines three key reasons for why Sri Lanka should reconsider reconsolidating generation, transmission, and distribution under 100% State control.

Bullets

• Sri Lanka’s challenges demand private capital: Continued reliance on public financing to cover the CEB’s losses and infrastructure needs is fiscally unsustainable. Circular debt, State guarantees, and legacy liabilities already burden the Treasury, threatening Sri Lanka’s ability to maintain its primary surplus and meet International Monetary Fund (IMF) commitments. They also undermine the country’s creditworthiness, limiting access to capital markets and affordable borrowing. Unbundling the electricity sector can help address this by creating a range of investment opportunities, allowing private investors to engage in specific segments that align with their risk-return preferences.

• Unbundling the electricity industry has economic merit: Drawing on some global examples, the paper demonstrates how unbundling has improved operational efficiency, transparency, and service delivery, particularly when supported by competitive tendering and strong regulatory oversight.

• Strategic interests can be protected without full State ownership: Global and local experience show that strategic assets in generation, transmission, and distribution can be safeguarded through strong regulation, public-private partnerships, and majority State ownership, without full State monopolisation. The paper highlights the case of Lanka Electricity Company (LECO), a publicly owned but commercially governed distributor that has consistently delivered operational efficiency and innovation due to competitive pressures. Rather than dismantling LECO and absorbing it into a centralised, 100% State-owned entity (as proposed), the paper argues that this successful model should be replicated and scaled.

The full position paper is available for download at: https://shorturl.at/Bijus

(https://www.advocata.org/media-archives/2025/07/09powering-forward-why-unbundling-the-ceb-is-critical-for-sri-lankas-energy-future).

Advocata SOE Reform Roadmap : Getting the State Out of Business: The Compelling Case for Privatisation of State-Owned Businesses

Sri Lanka's state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are a major hindrance to the country’s economic prosperity. The state's footprints extend across all major industries - telecommunications, banking, ports, petroleum, and power generation. With over 400 SOEs spread across 33 sectors and employing roughly 250,000 workers, they form an inefficient, bloated bureaucracy. The IMF's Governance Diagnostic Assessment flags SOEs as being high-risk for corruption, plagued by weak management, shoddy oversight, rigged procurement processes, political interference, and a lack of transparency. Sri Lanka cannot afford the status quo. Decisive action to privatise SOEs is essential to break free from the cycle of inefficiency and corruption, and unlock sustainable economic growth.

Here is the link to the Advocata SOE Reform Roadmap in English on

Getting the State Out of Business: The Compelling Case for Privatisation of State-Owned Businesses

Here is the link to the Advocata SOE Reform Roadmap in Sinhala

Here is the link to the Advocata SOE Reform Roadmap in Tamil

Advocata Policy Brief : The Role of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) as a Sustainable Alternative to Public Infrastructure Investments in Sri Lanka

The Budget Speech 2024 revealed that Sri Lanka plans to accelerate Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) to secure the required investments and expertise to facilitate continued provision of much needed public infrastructure projects across the country. Against the backdrop of Sri Lanka’s efforts to come out of its current economic crisis, which was largely caused by the mismanagement of public finances and unsustainable levels of national debt - partly taken to fund large scale public infrastructure projects, this indication to involve the private sector in public infrastructure service provision going forward is a positive and sustainable sign.

However, the PPP framework in Sri Lanka at present is characterised by multiple institutional and regulatory weaknesses, which should be resolved before PPPs can fully serve to facilitate sustainable infrastructure investments in the country.

Here is the link to the Advocata Policy Brief on The Role of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) as a Sustainable Alternative to Public Infrastructure Investments in Sri Lanka

South Asia Economic Outlook: World Bank | Infrastructure Challenges & Economic Growth | Murtaza Jafferjee | Maurizio Bussolo

In this episode of Advocata Studio, Advocata Chair, Murtaza Jafferjee is joined by Maurizio Bussolo, (Lead Economist, Chief Economist Office for South Asia, The World Bank). In this video he discusses with Murtaza Jafferjee on trade, gender inequality, and economic growth in South Asia, and its impact on productivity. He also addresses the South Asia's economic growth and infrastructure challenges.

Watch the full discussion here:

Maurizio Bussolo, (Lead Economist, Chief Economist Office for South Asia, The World Bank) also presents a report on South Asia's economic outlook, highlighting slowing growth and challenges such as weak private investment and fiscal position.

The presentation by Maurizio on South Asia Development Update: Toward faster, Cleaner Growth can be accessed here